Super Fight over ‘Superhero’ Trademark
In this day and age, geek is chic. Superheroes and comic book characters dominate movies, video games, and even television shows now. Brands like DC Comics and Marvel have experienced a resurgence in popularity, and with it, new intellectual property disputes have taken front stage. While the more common narrative in intellectual property law concerns licensing rights of superhero names and personas to movie studios, newer issues regarding branding and trademark rights have recently come to light. For instance, DC Comics made the news several times this year due to cease-and-desist letters they have sent out.
For example, DC Comics warned a Chicago ice cream parlor against using a mark that contained a shield shape that DC alleged was too similar to the Superman crest:
Similarly, Superhero Creamery & T-Shirt Factory, in Kentucky, received legal notices from both Marvel and DC Comics regarding their use of the term “superhero.”
The basis for DC and Marvel’s challenge comes from their co-ownership of the trademark for “superhero.” While they own the mark chiefly for use in connection with publications, they have challenged other uses of the mark. Notably, however, DC and Marvel have yet to pursue a legal challenge to its end in court. Many legal experts contend that it may have to do with a fear of a precedent judgment against them.
Undoubtedly many small business owners may use the phrase in connection with goods or services Marvel and DC do not care about. Instead, it is the use with goods or services that are reminiscent of DC or Marvel’s most famous superheroes (i.e., intellectual property), that courts the attention of the comic book giants. Using the mark without any attempt at registration may buy them some time, but building goodwill with a mark takes time and money; as such, small business owners should avoid such use. Moreover, if the business owner has interest in using a design mark, they should not rely on designs that are similar or reminiscent of any superhero persona. Many superheroes have signs or symbols that represent them, and to use these symbols (or confusingly similar ones) could be against trademark law and courts would find it to be unfairly profiting off the goodwill built by Marvel and DC.
While some may argue that Marvel and DC may be overstepping by claiming complete ownership of the “superhero” term, others can also argue that it would be unfair for some businesses to use the popularity of superheroes to appeal to kids or a certain niche audiences.
While it remains to be seen how these trademark battles will play out, counsel should advise clients against using “superhero” in a manner that would be deemed confusingly similar to DC or Marvel’s holdings.
Want to learn more about trademarks?
Do you need trademark protection?
For more information on this topic, please visit our Trademark Protection service page, which is part of our Trademark Practice.
Klemchuk LLP is an Intellectual Property (IP), Technology, Internet, and Business law firm located in Dallas, TX. The firm offers comprehensive legal services including litigation and enforcement of all forms of IP as well as registration and licensing of patents, trademarks, trade dress, and copyrights. The firm also provides a wide range of technology, Internet, e-commerce, and business services including business planning, formation, and financing, mergers and acquisitions, business litigation, data privacy, and domain name dispute resolution.Additional information about the trademark law firm and its trademark attorneys may be found at www.klemchuk.com.
Klemchuk LLP hosts Culture Counts, a blog devoted to the discussion of law firm culture and corporate core values with frequent topics about positive work environment, conscious capitalism, entrepreneurial management, positive workplace culture, workplace productivity, and corporate core values.